Differences in the limb blood flow between two types of blood flow restriction cuffs: A pilot study

Differences in the limb blood flow between two types of blood flow restriction cuffs: A pilot study

Blog Article

Introduction: The determination of the optimal occlusion level is a key parameter in blood flow restriction (BFR).This study aimed to compare the effects of elastic (BStrong) vs.nylon (Hokanson) BFR cuffs on blood flow in the lower and upper limbs.Methods: Eleven healthy participants undertook several BFR sessions with 2 different cuffs of similar width on their lower and upper limbs at different A female generational reading of the Movie Two Women pressures [200, 250, 300, 350, and 400 mmHg for BStrong and 0, 40, and 60% of the arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) for Hokanson].Doppler ultrasound recorded blood flows through the brachial and femoral artery at Identification of wild-caught phlebotomine sand flies from Crete and Cyprus using DNA barcoding rest.

Results: With BStrong, only 350 and 400 mmHg pressures were significantly different from resting values (0% AOP).With Hokanson, both 40% and 60% of the AOP were significantly different from resting values (p < 0.05).Discussion: While both cuffs elicited BFR, they failed to accurately modulate blood flow.Hokanson is appropriate for research settings while BStrong appears to be a convenient tool for practitioners due to its safety (i.

e., the impossibility of completely occluding arteries) and the possibility of exercising freely detached from the pump.